euro-toolhub.eu
Cloud & hosting

Aruba LogoArubavsHetzner LogoHetzner

Both score similarly on sovereignty (84 vs 85). The right choice depends on the details below – open source, self-hosting, pricing and focus.

Score comparison

ArubaHetzner
Sovereignty
84
85
Privacy
80
80
Open Source
10
10
Business fit
84
82
Migration ease
64
60
Pricing transparency
76
92
Enterprise readiness
84
80

Features & facts

ArubaHetzner
CountryItalyGermany
Open SourceNoNo
Self-HostingNoNo
Cloud/SaaSYesYes
EU data residencyYesYes
DPA / AV-VertragYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
Data locationItaly/EU (own data centers, incl. Arezzo)Germany (Nuremberg, Falkenstein), Finland (Helsinki)
Fromon request3,79 € / Monat
Founded19941997
Aruba Logo

Aruba

Italy

Italy's leading cloud and hosting provider with its own data centers – a European alternative for cloud, hosting and domains.

Strengths

  • Own data centers in Italy/EU, ISO 27001 certified
  • Broad portfolio: cloud, hosting, domains, PEC/trust services
  • Established and market-leading in Italy
  • EU data storage without US-hyperscaler dependency

Weaknesses

  • Not open source, no self-hosting
  • Less serverless/managed-PaaS depth than large hyperscalers
  • Less known internationally outside Italy
View profile
Hetzner Logo

Hetzner

Germany

German cloud and server provider with very good value for money and data centers in DE/FI.

Strengths

  • Very low, transparent prices (cloud from approx. €3.79/month)
  • Own data centers in Germany and Finland, ISO 27001:2022 + BSI C5
  • Reliable cloud and dedicated servers

Weaknesses

  • Smaller managed-services portfolio than AWS/Azure
  • Fewer ready-made PaaS building blocks
View profile

Choose Aruba if…

  • Companies wanting cloud servers and hosting in the EU
  • Italian and European organisations
  • Teams needing domains and certified email

Choose Hetzner if…

  • Developers and SMEs with their own ops know-how
  • Cost-conscious projects that need standard infrastructure

Scores are editorial orientation, not legal advice. Details are based on public provider information and are not independently verified.