euro-toolhub.eu
Cloud & hosting

Aruba LogoArubavsIONOS LogoIONOS

Both score similarly on sovereignty (84 vs 80). The right choice depends on the details below – open source, self-hosting, pricing and focus.

Score comparison

ArubaIONOS
Sovereignty
84
80
Privacy
80
75
Open Source
10
10
Business fit
84
80
Migration ease
64
62
Pricing transparency
76
80
Enterprise readiness
84
78

Features & facts

ArubaIONOS
CountryItalyGermany
Open SourceNoNo
Self-HostingNoNo
Cloud/SaaSYesYes
EU data residencyYesYes
DPA / AV-VertragYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
Data locationItaly/EU (own data centers, incl. Arezzo)Germany/EU (including Frankfurt, Berlin)
Fromon request1 € / Monat
Founded19941988
Aruba Logo

Aruba

Italy

Italy's leading cloud and hosting provider with its own data centers – a European alternative for cloud, hosting and domains.

Strengths

  • Own data centers in Italy/EU, ISO 27001 certified
  • Broad portfolio: cloud, hosting, domains, PEC/trust services
  • Established and market-leading in Italy
  • EU data storage without US-hyperscaler dependency

Weaknesses

  • Not open source, no self-hosting
  • Less serverless/managed-PaaS depth than large hyperscalers
  • Less known internationally outside Italy
View profile
IONOS Logo

IONOS

Germany

Large German hosting and cloud provider with a broad offering from web hosting to enterprise cloud.

Strengths

  • Very broad product portfolio, low-cost entry
  • European data centers, ISO 27001-certified
  • Sovereign offerings for the public sector

Weaknesses

  • Product variety can feel confusing
  • Parts of the infrastructure run in Equinix data centers
  • Cloud platform is less developer-centric than Scaleway/Hetzner
View profile

Choose Aruba if…

  • Companies wanting cloud servers and hosting in the EU
  • Italian and European organisations
  • Teams needing domains and certified email

Choose IONOS if…

  • SMEs that want hosting and cloud from a single source
  • Organizations that need sovereign offerings

Scores are editorial orientation, not legal advice. Details are based on public provider information and are not independently verified.